He-Man 2 and Storytelling

-

 So, a new He-Man cartoon is coming to Netflix.

And I'm here for it.
But already the whiners are coming out of the woodwork - people who didn't like the first series, and are thus automatically expecting the second series to suck.

Notice:  The first series didn't suck. You just didn't like it. There's a difference.

Me? I liked the new series. Why?
Because it was more than a 30-minute toy commercial.
Because it added to the lore of the setting.
Because we got to look at other characters and learn more about them.

Because it showed a very interesting side to society - that being 'everyone relied on He-Man, how does the world react to him dying?' His very absence and how people responded to it - how society changed - was interesting. He doesn't have to be there to have his presence felt.

We got to learn more about Castle Greyskull, more about the power of He-Man, more about Teela's heritage, more about Evil-Lyn. The world became more complex, more detailed, and richer for the experience. It became more than a power-fantasy, it became a setting, the characters became more than flat stereotypes.

And the complaints?
  • Bad storytelling?  No. It wasn't. It's just not the story these people wanted. And it shouldn't have had to be.
  • Too much Teela, not enough He-Man? That's subjective - I liked the way it played out - I liked that it pulled the rug out from under the audience.
  • He-Man didn't do enough? Subjective. He did a lot - he just didn't do it alone, which was a very refreshing change.
The 80s cartoon was simple. Painfully so at times. It was incredibly one-dimensional, and most of the characters were paper-thin archetypes. This series was not that. It was complex, the characters were fleshed out more, the way that the characters interacted with each other made for a richer tapestry.

Was it wrong to bump He-Man out for the majority of the series? No, because, again, it showed what his absence did to civilization - what people had to do to adapt to a new world. And then it explored the lore of Greyskull and He-Man, and then it brought him back.

Sometimes, to learn about a character, you need to remove them from the scene. It's advanced storytelling. It might not be what any particular viewer wants - but that doesn't make the story objectively bad. Hell, there's shows I like, then they get to a certain point, and I won't watch it.  Not because it's bad - I'll admit that the show is probably still quite good.  It just isn't the kind of story I enjoy.

No, I think a bunch of people wanted nostalgic power-fantasy, and didn't get it. Well, here's the thing. Kevin Smith had a story he wanted to tell. This was his story, not theirs. And if they didn't like it? *shrug*  Not his problem. I enjoyed it, I thought he did a good job, I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Setting and Balance and Elves, Oh My!

-
In which we discuss the history of AD&D through to Pathfinder and its impact on what one could play over time. In the early days of D&D, there was no rhyme or reason about how strong one thing might be against another. In the early days you could play a 'young' balor (demon) as part of the PC party. Later, with D&D, you could play were dragons, faeries, or other creatures of all sorts (BECM), and by the time AD&D came around there were half-ogres, drow, and a variety of other creatures of varying power. With 2nd edition AD&D, things became a bit more formalized. Level Adjustment was added to the mix, increasing the effective level of a character by their race. If you were strong enough, you were treated as one or two levels higher to determine how much XP you needed to level. This carried on into 3rd edition AD&D, which allowed players to play stronger characters at the cost of slower level growth. Then we get into Pathfinder. Here, level adjustment was ...
Read more

Renegade Studios

-
  A Review      I've had the luxury of picking up pretty much every one of the current e20 books by Renegade Studios -- including GI Joe, Transformers, Power Rangers, and My Little Pony. Because of the campaign I ran, I'll mainly focus on the first three, but you can expect that my comments would hold true for MLP as well. For this review I'll be using short form from time to time: GIJ: GI Joe, TF: Transformers: PR: Power Rangers, MLP: My Little Pony, and CRB for 'Core Rulebook'.     So where to begin.     Renegade Studios is using what they call the Essence 20 or 'e20' engine. Each of the game books uses the same engine, allowing for ease of play and of bringing one's characters from one setting to another (or fusing the settings together). Because of the order the books came out (I believe PR, TF, then GIJ) there are some slight bits of difference in the mechanics as Renegade got more comfortable with the engine and had a few more months or more...
Read more

🎵We can show you the world🎵

-
Image
World Building The short of it is simple: we love world building. We are fascinated by culture, religion, magic, and how this all intersects. What's the point of having a campaign if the characters aren't given the chance to immerse themselves in some aspect of the society they're in or reflect where they're from? We're really not that interested in lots of combat, or delving into dungeons, or world-shaking plots. We're really interested in looking at the cultures of the people around us, what the local faiths are and how they're reflected in the culture, and how these reflect the style of magic used by the local cultures. We're not interested in generic magic or generic faiths or in a culture which matches every other culture in every other fantasy game out there. If it's vanilla, something's missing. For an example? Well. We've a campaign world, Inspiritus . We've not had a chance to run things in that world in over 30 years, but we...
Read more